I have written before about why it is a bad idea to break the traffic code "willfully" (such as to drive with full knowledge that your license is suspended or that you have no insurance), by discussing the ruling of the New Jersey appellate court in the case of State v. Moran . Basically, it is because you could have your license suspended for doing so.
Well, on July 13, 2010, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a ruling on the appeal of that case. The Justices set forth standards that judges are to use when deciding whether (and how long) to suspend someone's driving privileges. The relevant law authorizes this punishment for any "willful" violation of the state's motor vehicle laws. In addition to ruling that this law applies to situations involving enhanced recklessness, the justices required that sentencing judges weigh, evaluate and note on the court record a number of factors before imposing a license suspension, including:
These are in addition to any other factors that the court may deem relevant.
In addition to these factors, the Court stated that comparisons to motor vehicle statutes that impose mandatory license suspensions also may be a useful guide in some cases. It is also not necessarily the number of the above considerations that apply, but the weight to be attributed to one or more of them.
My caution in my previous post still applies: don't think you are safe from license suspension because the traffic statute you break does not include that as a penalty; if the court deems your violation to be "willful," you could still lose your license. The ability to drive in New Jersey is a privilege, not a right!